Skip to content

Comments

[dynamodb] Fix <> operator#19680

Merged
lsiepel merged 1 commit intoopenhab:mainfrom
ccutrer:dynamodb-neq
Nov 21, 2025
Merged

[dynamodb] Fix <> operator#19680
lsiepel merged 1 commit intoopenhab:mainfrom
ccutrer:dynamodb-neq

Conversation

@ccutrer
Copy link
Member

@ccutrer ccutrer commented Nov 21, 2025

DynamoDB uses <>, not != which is the default symbol of Operator, so maintain an override just for that.

Signed-off-by: Cody Cutrer <cody@cutrer.us>
Copy link
Contributor

@lsiepel lsiepel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM

Regression of #19581

@lsiepel lsiepel merged commit f08667e into openhab:main Nov 21, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@ccutrer ccutrer deleted the dynamodb-neq branch November 21, 2025 15:05
@lsiepel lsiepel added enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on regression Regression that happened during the development of a release. Not shown on final release notes. labels Nov 21, 2025
@lsiepel lsiepel added this to the 5.1 milestone Nov 21, 2025

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ssalonen
Copy link
Contributor

Was there a test for this in itests?

@ccutrer
Copy link
Member Author

ccutrer commented Nov 21, 2025

There's a test for it in the regular unit tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on regression Regression that happened during the development of a release. Not shown on final release notes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants